Let’s start out with a little inventory of free classes you can get online from the Trumpian education system in lieu of higher educations because everyone knows that educated people who don’t strive for abusive power don’t vote for dictators, like Trump.
- Trumpian Authoritarianism & Linguistics – How to effectively avoid hard questions by ad hominem attacks on the person asking. The acute ability to make an issue about the person by attacking them and dodging the question so hard, that the issue and media coverage becomes this attack, not the unanswered question. This is a tactic of a very, very weak minded individual who has made a life of ordering people around under them (employees, customers, vendors) and expecting them to put up with the abuse. When faced with someone who doesn’t answer to them, they can’t give a good answer so they dodge it by making the conversation about that person as lacking desirable qualities in a person. When the the only desirable quality would be to be truthful and just answer the questions or say, you don’t know. However, Trump only says, he doesn’t know to dodge accountability even when he is giving the orders (ie another form of lying). Making the conversation a WWE wrestling event, that, litterally, stupid fucking people actually think you are some decisive winner because you had the audacity to act like a huge ass-clown. However, if you are MAGA, you are generally not known for your intelligence, just loyalty.
- Vancian Master Class on Impish-ism & Minion ethics – Incredible ways to efficiently be a sycophant under an ineffective dictator (special education by appointed individuals that excel at having exceptional deception tactics in place of qualifications to do their respectively appointed jobs). Special quotations by Vance on how to attack leaders from other countries and dodge any meaningful discussions (special training on any kind of necessity of diplomatic tact at all). How-to’s on making up issues that are so ad hominem and recruiting media to push that agenda to deviate so far from the original, UNANSWERED question that people who have the mental capacity to chase the rabbit forget what it was all about to begin with. Congrat’s Tik Tok attention span people (makes you wonder why Trump fought so hard to keep Tik Tok, helping dumb down everyone, every day on their phone).
- Noemian Constitutional Principles – How to NOT know anything about the US Constitution and mis-quote it like you have a clue to abuse the authority you have been granted under it’s powers. (Special commentary by Kristi Noem(skull) on how to make up Trumpian fake news and sell it like you are an authority on the subject). Special examples of MAGA cultists, completely ignoring reality and believing the made up rhetoric fabricated by In-Administration individuals that push the envelope of ignorance in society.
- Bondian Law – How to weaponize federal power and attempt to apply reverse psychology on an entire population into believing that, actual, previous law was abused because it brought a criminal, like Trump, to justice.
- Trumpian Oraclism – Doubling down on making predictions that corruption is prevalent, when you know you are going to fail at advancing your initiatives. (ie. Saying there is going to be fraud or corruption if things do not go as you planned). Mansplaining away every possibility to look like you are the end all, be all, authority on everything to a base of supporters, who couldn’t think their way outside the box even with a roadmap and keys to the exit.
- TBA – future classes will be updated and listed. Check back for more.
You don’t need a higher education system that creates a critical thinker who questions many things to further education, development or knowledge. You need to just listen to good old Trump and be a good MAGA DRONE. Don’t question anything, just swallow the bullshit as higher gospel. NO FACT CHECKING HERE, FACT CHECKING = BAD.
It is almost as if Trump would need to get rid of the systems that create higher educated individuals that would challenge his false narratives. Hrrmmm… How would you go about that? Maybe something like, tear down any institution that helps fund higher education (OH! Like the Department of Education). Then find some way to to make up some excuse to remove financial support for any kind of higher education, like taking back any grant money (that’s a good one, then you can divert that money when no one is asking where it went WITHOUT ANY ACCOUNTABILITY! Why? because the Supreme Court said I could because I packed it in my previous administration). This is a great way to remove any kind of power Congress has to do anything because now the Presidency can change money however he sees fit. Sound more and more like a dictatorship every single day.
The Supreme court should revisit some of these horrible decisions they have made. It’s not like that don’t have staris decisis or anything. Nope, make a horrible decision for, let’s say, half a century or so, like the Tanney court did in Plessy v. Ferguson (1896). Then let’s just stick to it because racism is OK under the Supreme Court’s eyes. Fast forward to Citizen’s United. This time it is not about race, well, sort of. It is about wealthy and class control of government on the table, but the Supreme Court did not see (a few dissenter’s did) that the removing limitations on wealth just breeds corruption on a HUGE scale. The court should re-open Citizen’s United and correct the injustice it has done to the rights of every individual who outnumber upper echelon wager earners and above. The Court obviously missed this forseeable outcome and a perfect challenge would be Musk giving a million dollars away to buy people’s votes. If you buy one vote, you have removed the liberty and freedom’s this country was founded on.
It calls to question, whether the court is part of that corruption or not. If they are, then the Constitution should be amended that if the court members are under any influence of personal gain from a decision, they should recuse themselves or risk being removed from the court by an action of impeachment which would require a 3/4 majority (yes, a high bar) to remove them. However, with that much apparent corruption to the court, this should not be hard to achieve if any member of the court is that flagrant. Justice Alito and Thomas have been suspected for a very, very long time of their opinions being swayed by lavish endorsements and gift-like things given to them. When money influences decisions, it removes impartiality and justice all together.
So, it is late and this is another half done piece. Enough for one night. I may come back and addend more later.
About the Author
